Scientific Illustration

  1. Search
  2. Ask me anything
  3. Submit
  4. Subscribe
  5. Archive
  6. Random
  • heracliteanfire:

Nightjar and longhorn beetle. John William Lewin, 1798 (via British Museum)

    heracliteanfire:

    Nightjar and longhorn beetle. John William Lewin, 1798 (via British Museum)

    Tagged: Nightjar bird longhorn beetle beetle John William Lewin 1798 insect

    Posted on March 15, 2012 via A London Salmagundi with 36 notes

  • biomedicalephemera:

Pieds d’Oiseaux - The Feet of Birds
You can clearly see the wide range of foot structures found in the Neornithes, and the intended usage of some of them is pretty obvious. When it comes to classifying the foot structure of birds, there are several characteristics that are noted, but the defining factor is the orientation of the digits (toes). Birds generally have four toes.
One term you might not know that’s important is the hallux - this is the innermost (“first”) digit of the foot, homologous to the big toe in humans. In birds, it often points backwards. It’s sometimes very well-developed (such as in perching birds), and sometimes so small it’s almost absent.
Anisodactyly (“unequal digit”) - This configuration is basically the standard. The three toes face forward, with the hallux facing backwards, so as to let the bird perch. This is present in songbirds and perching birds. Hawks, eagles, and falcons also have this configuration.
Syndactyly (“same digit”) - The third and fourth toes (outer and middle) are united for much of their length, and have a broad sole in common. You can see this in the kingfisher and the bee-eaters.
Zygodactyl (“yoke digit”) - The toes are arranged with digits 2 and 3 facing forwards, and digits 1 and 4 facing backwards. You can see this in parrots, woodpeckers, and roadrunners.
Heterodactyl (“different digit”) - Toes 1 and 2 are facing back, with 3 and 4 facing forward. This is only found in trogons.
Pamprodactyl (“Every digit”) - All four digits face forward, only found in swifts - this is a somewhat contested classification, as it’s believed that no birds use this as a primary configuration, even if swifts have been observed using it during their rare landings.
There are other useful terms when classifying birds by their foot structure, that have more to do with the type of bird itself, rather than the configuration of its bones. These classifications can include birds with more than one dactylous configuration.
Raptorial - Feet like the raptors and owls. These are strong, deeply cleft, with sturdy talons, meant for grasping and ripping.
Semipalmate - “Half-webbed” feet, where the anterior toes are only partially webbed. The Semipalmated Plover is a bird with these feet.
Totipalmate - “Fully webbed” feet, with all four toes united by one web - these are found on birds like cormorants.
Palmate - “Webbed” feet. These are your “basic” webbed feet - the three front toes are united, like in gulls and ducks. The fourth digit is not connected to the web.
Lobate - A swimming foot with a series of lobes along the toes. Found in birds like grebes.
Tableau Elementaire de l’Histoire Naturelle des Animaux par Georges Cuvier. 1798.

    biomedicalephemera:

    Pieds d’Oiseaux - The Feet of Birds

    You can clearly see the wide range of foot structures found in the Neornithes, and the intended usage of some of them is pretty obvious. When it comes to classifying the foot structure of birds, there are several characteristics that are noted, but the defining factor is the orientation of the digits (toes). Birds generally have four toes.

    One term you might not know that’s important is the hallux - this is the innermost (“first”) digit of the foot, homologous to the big toe in humans. In birds, it often points backwards. It’s sometimes very well-developed (such as in perching birds), and sometimes so small it’s almost absent.

    Anisodactyly (“unequal digit”) - This configuration is basically the standard. The three toes face forward, with the hallux facing backwards, so as to let the bird perch. This is present in songbirds and perching birds. Hawks, eagles, and falcons also have this configuration.

    Syndactyly (“same digit”) - The third and fourth toes (outer and middle) are united for much of their length, and have a broad sole in common. You can see this in the kingfisher and the bee-eaters.

    Zygodactyl (“yoke digit”) - The toes are arranged with digits 2 and 3 facing forwards, and digits 1 and 4 facing backwards. You can see this in parrots, woodpeckers, and roadrunners.

    Heterodactyl (“different digit”) - Toes 1 and 2 are facing back, with 3 and 4 facing forward. This is only found in trogons.

    Pamprodactyl (“Every digit”) - All four digits face forward, only found in swifts - this is a somewhat contested classification, as it’s believed that no birds use this as a primary configuration, even if swifts have been observed using it during their rare landings.

    There are other useful terms when classifying birds by their foot structure, that have more to do with the type of bird itself, rather than the configuration of its bones. These classifications can include birds with more than one dactylous configuration.

    Raptorial - Feet like the raptors and owls. These are strong, deeply cleft, with sturdy talons, meant for grasping and ripping.

    Semipalmate - “Half-webbed” feet, where the anterior toes are only partially webbed. The Semipalmated Plover is a bird with these feet.

    Totipalmate - “Fully webbed” feet, with all four toes united by one web - these are found on birds like cormorants.

    Palmate - “Webbed” feet. These are your “basic” webbed feet - the three front toes are united, like in gulls and ducks. The fourth digit is not connected to the web.

    Lobate - A swimming foot with a series of lobes along the toes. Found in birds like grebes.

    Tableau Elementaire de l’Histoire Naturelle des Animaux par Georges Cuvier. 1798.

    Tagged: natural history comparative anatomy feet birds aves cuvier 1790s 1798 18th century dactyly oiseaux neornithes biomedicalephemera terminology etymology

    Posted on March 3, 2012 via Biomedical Ephemera, or: A Frog for Your Boils with 523 notes

  • biomedicalephemera:

Comparison of Skeletons of Red-Blooded Animals
Cuvier’s last words were supposedly “Nurse, it was I who discovered leeches have red blood.”
Linnaeus’s classification of species was highly dependent upon blood color and whether or not they were cold-blooded. Mammals, birds, amphibians [he included reptiles with amphibians], and fish all had red blood. Insects and “Vermes” (mollusks & related species) had white blood and no vertebrae. 
Cuvier discovered that leeches had red blood early in his career, and this influenced his belief that Linnaeus’s system was far too simplistic, and that it was important to NOT focus on each group/species individually. He believed that investigating the differences and similarities between groups and species was far more important than isolating everything in neat little capsules. Everything was related to everything else in some way. This was against everything that the prominent naturalists of the time believed, but eventually influenced a young Charles Darwin…what a cool guy.
Elementaire de l’Histoire Naturelle des Animaux par G. Cuvier, de l’Institut National de France. 1798.

    biomedicalephemera:

    Comparison of Skeletons of Red-Blooded Animals

    Cuvier’s last words were supposedly “Nurse, it was I who discovered leeches have red blood.”

    Linnaeus’s classification of species was highly dependent upon blood color and whether or not they were cold-blooded. Mammals, birds, amphibians [he included reptiles with amphibians], and fish all had red blood. Insects and “Vermes” (mollusks & related species) had white blood and no vertebrae. 

    Cuvier discovered that leeches had red blood early in his career, and this influenced his belief that Linnaeus’s system was far too simplistic, and that it was important to NOT focus on each group/species individually.
    He believed that investigating the differences and similarities between groups and species was far more important than isolating everything in neat little capsules. Everything was related to everything else in some way. This was against everything that the prominent naturalists of the time believed, but eventually influenced a young Charles Darwin…what a cool guy.

    Elementaire de l’Histoire Naturelle des Animaux par G. Cuvier, de l’Institut National de France. 1798.

    Tagged: Comparative Anatomy biology anatomy zoology french natural history fish goose bird Quadrupeds 18th Century 1700s 1790s 1798 skeleton bones Cuvier Georges Cuvier last words naturalist

    Posted on September 16, 2011 via Biomedical Ephemera, or: A Frog for Your Boils with 64 notes

Field Notes Theme. Designed by Manasto Jones. Powered by Tumblr.